Stasi cultuur Justitie!

FacebookTwitterGoogle+Share

 

 
‘Never in history…
has a single loving couple…
been betrayed so badly…
for so long…
by so many…!’ Hans Smedema

Stasi cultuur bij Ministerie van Geen-Justitie en Hirsch Ballin in het bijzonder!

If you shut up the truth and bury it under the ground, it will but grow, and gather to itself such explosive power that the day it bursts through it will blow up everything in its way.” – French author Emile Zola

“All truth passes through three stages: First, it is ridiculed; Second, it is violently opposed; and Third, it is accepted as self-evident.” Arthur Schopenhauer (1788-1860)

Het ware (stasi)gezicht van oud Minister Hirsch Ballin komt prachtig boven tafel in zijn huidige voorstel om Officieren van Justitie, dus vaak de kneusjes uit de maatschappij(zie Petra Rietveld-Hoekstra parket Leeuwarden in mijn smaadzaak door politieslager Jeroen van Bruggen rechtbank Leeuwarden 9 februari 2009), het recht te geven om websites zelfstandig, dus ZONDER toetsing door de rechter, af te sluiten voor het argeloze Nederlandse volk. Opvallend is dat veel van de minst ethisch denkenden, CDA leden zijn!

Deze website of Blog zou dan al in begin 2008 uit de lucht gehaald zijn door Officier van Justitie, kneusje Petra Rietveld-Hoekstra. Want dit slag onmenselijke wezens vinden het heel normaal dat slachtoffers van terreur van de Staat der Nederlanden zelf, zich niet mogen verdedigen, geen advocaat nodig hebben, geen onderzoek nodig omdat ze toch al WETEN dat het slachtoffer zelf schuldig is,  etc. Lees iedere willekeurige krant over het gebrek aan ethisch besef.

Of website al veel eerder verboden door Ministerie van Geen-Justitie zelf natuurlijk in opdracht van de desbetreffende politici die deze samenzwering tegen Hans Smedema en zijn vrouw, voor het hele Nederlandse volk verborgen willen houden. Dat moet dom gehouden en lastige pottenkijkers zijn daarbij ongewenst. Typisch regentesk. Stazi cultuur dus.

Dat deze oud Minister Hirsch Ballin glashard en onethisch en dergelijk voorstel bij de kamer in durft te dienen, zonder zich dood te schamen, zegt iets over de cultuur binnen Geen-Justitie. Alleen oprichten van een compleet nieuwe organisatie met ‘echte’ en ‘integere’ medewerkers met hoog ethisch moreel besef in een volledig nieuwe cultuur, kan Nederland van deze verouderde antieke organisaties redden. Mijn casus van samenzwering en doofpot tegen het Nederlandse volk, hoogstwaarschijnlijk een CDA initiatief, bewijst dat prachtig.


Wikileaks

Wikileaks.org , een organisatie voor internationale klokkenluiders net als de Nederlandse klokkenluideronline.nl, geeft prachtig uitleg van de redenen waarom juist extreme openheid, het enige middel is om corruptheid en machtsmisbruik tegen te gaan. Net als Hans Smedema al jaren doet met deze extreem open Blog. Hier een paar van hun redenen:

  • WikiLeaks is a multi-jurisdictional public service designed to protect whistleblowers, journalists and activists who have sensitive materials to communicate to the public. Since July 2007, we have worked across the globe to obtain, publish and defend such materials, and, also, to fight in the legal and political spheres for the broader principles on which our work is based: the integrity of our common historical record and the rights of all peoples to create new history.
  • We believe that transparency in government activities leads to reduced corruption, better government and stronger democracies. All governments can benefit from increased scrutiny by the world community, as well as their own people. We believe this scrutiny requires information. Historically that information has been costly – in terms of human life and human rights. But with technological advances – the internet, and cryptography – the risks of conveying important information can be lowered.
  • In its landmark ruling on the Pentagon Papers, the US Supreme Court ruled that “only a free and unrestrained press can effectively expose deception in government.” We agree.
  • We believe that it is not only the people of one country that keep their government honest, but also the people of other countries who are watching that government. That is why the time has come for an anonymous global avenue for disseminating documents the public should see.
  • It is only when the people know the true plans and behavior of their governments that they can meaningfully choose to support them. Historically, the most resilient forms of open government are those where publication and revelation are protected. Where that protection does not exist, it is our mission to provide it.
  • We believe WikiLeaks is the strongest way we have of generating the true democracy and good governance on which all mankind’s dreams depend.
  • WikiLeaks combines the protection and anonymity of cutting-edge cryptographic technologies with the comfortable presentation style of Wikipedia, although the two are not otherwise related. Our network also collects materials in person and from postal drops. We also run a network of lawyers and others to defend our work and our sources.
  • WikiLeaks information is distributed across many jurisdictions, organizations and individuals. Once a document published it is essentially impossible to censor.
  • Principled leaking has changed the course of history for the better; it can alter the course of history in the present; it can lead us to a better future.
  • Consider Daniel Ellsberg, working within the US government during the Vietnam War. He comes into contact with the Pentagon Papers, a meticulously kept record of military and strategic planning throughout the war. Those papers reveal the depths to which the US government has sunk in deceiving the population about the war. Yet the public and the media know nothing of this urgent and shocking information. Indeed, secrecy laws are being used to keep the public ignorant of gross dishonesty practiced by their government. In spite of those secrecy laws and at great personal risk, Ellsberg manages to disseminate the Pentagon papers to journalists and to the world. Despite criminal charges against Ellsberg, eventually dropped, the release of the Pentagon papers shocks the world, exposes the government, and helps to shorten the war and save thousands of lives.
  • The power of principled leaking to embarrass governments, corporations and institutions is amply demonstrated through recent history. The public scrutiny of otherwise unaccountable and secretive institutions forces them to consider the ethical implications of their actions. Which official will chance a secret, corrupt transaction when the public is likely to find out? What repressive plan will be carried out when it is revealed to the citizenry, not just of its own country, but the world? When the risks of embarrassment and discovery increase, the tables are turned against conspiracy, corruption, exploitation and oppression. Open government answers injustice rather than causing it. Open government exposes and undoes corruption. Open governance is the most effective method of promoting good governance.
  • Today, with authoritarian governments in power around much of the world, increasing authoritarian tendencies in democratic governments, and increasing amounts of power vested in unaccountable corporations, the need for openness and transparency is greater than ever. In an important sense, WikiLeaks is the first intelligence agency of the people. Better principled and less parochial than any governmental intelligence agency, it is able to be more accurate and relevant. It has no commercial or national interests at heart; its only interest is the revelation of the truth. Unlike the covert activities of state intelligence agencies, WikiLeaks relies upon the power of overt fact to enable and empower citizens to bring feared and corrupt governments and corporations to justice. WikiLeaks helps every government official, every bureaucrat, and every corporate worker, who becomes privy to embarrassing information that the institution wants to hide but the public needs to know. What conscience cannot contain, and institutional secrecy unjustly conceals, WikiLeaks can broadcast to the world.
  • WikiLeaks is a buttress against unaccountable and abusive power.
  • We propose that authoritarian governments, oppressive institutions and corrupt corporations should be subject to the pressure, not merely of international diplomacy, freedom of information laws or even periodic elections, but of something far stronger — the consciences of the people within them.

Should the press really be free?

  • In its landmark ruling on the Pentagon Papers, the US Supreme Court ruled that “only a free and unrestrained press can effectively expose deception in government.” We agree.
  • The ruling stated that “paramount among the responsibilities of a free press is the duty to prevent any part of the government from deceiving the people and sending them off to distant lands to die of foreign fevers and foreign shot and shell.”
  • It is easy to perceive the connection between publication and the complaints people make about publication. But this generates a perception bias, because it overlooks the vastness of the invisible. It overlooks the unintended consequences of failing to publish and it overlooks all those who are emancipated by a climate of free speech. Such a climate is a motivating force for governments and corporations to act justly. If acting in a just manner is easier than acting in an unjust manner, most actions will be just.
  • Sufficient leaking will bring down many administrations that rely on concealing reality from their peoples.

Doofpot-affaire Hans Smedema is veel erger dan de beroemde Dreyfus-affaire!

Zware verantwoording voor de vrije pers is hun plicht om te voorkomen dat enig onderdeel van de overheid het volk kan bedriegen! (US Supreme Court)

Toch ziet geen enkele Nederlandse journalist blijkbaar kans om de grootste samenzwering van de Nederlandse staat tegen een weerloos verliefd stelletje(en tegen het hele onwetende bedrogen Nederlandse volk) sinds 1973, en wat door die doofpot tot heden gewoon ijskoud doorgaat, open te breken. Telegraaf weigert publicatie, net als Leeuwarder Courant met veel inside informatie! Peter R. de Vries en John van den Heuvel weigeren ook al.

Het lijkt verboden op grond staatsveiligheid. Wat een drogreden is, want het is dan alleen ter bescherming van de naam van Koningin Juliana voor gemaakte blunders van hooggeplaatste ambtenaren en Ministers. Naast de bescherming van medeplichtigen en initiatiefnemers  zoals broer mr. Johan Smedema uit Gennep en zwager Tjitte de Jong uit Norg. Beiden ontkennen alles en liegen en bedriegen dat het een lieve lust is.

Deze doofpot is opgezet en was uitsluitend mogelijk  met hulp van CDA leden! Zwager Tjitte de Jong uit Norg, die deze doofpot in stand wil houden, is voorzitter CDA Drenthe las ik ergens en uit mijn onderzoek blijkt het CDA zwaar betrokken. Oud Minister President JanPeter Balkenende heeft samen met Donner ook al weer geweigerd om deze doofpot te beëindigen! Beiden alweer CDA!

Met oprechte diepe minachting,

later meer…

Hans Smedema

Copyright 2010 Hans Smedema, Parcent, Spanje.